You know I really try not to create posts announcing people
who are the epitome of stupidity; because when I say the epitome of stupidity I
really mean it. Sure I will call people an idiot or stupid for being as dumb as
a sack of potatoes, but this goes far beyond that realm. I call it the “epitome
of stupidity” because this is an example of pure, real, stupidity at its
finest.
Linda Harvey has offered a rather interesting theory about
why the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of "equal protection of the
laws" shouldn't apply to marriage equality, or seemingly to gay people at
all, for that matter, since "people are not naturally homosexual." Apparently,
being a "gay person" doesn't actually qualify one as a
"person" under Harvey's understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Her theory: “Why
should the equal protection argument be made in favor of homosexual behavior,
which is changeable? People are not
naturally homosexual, so the definition of ‘person’ in the Fourteenth Amendment
is being twisted to make this assumption. ‘Person’ should be understood based
on historic, beneficial, or at least neutral and fact-based traits; it should
not be twisted to incorporate behavior that most religions and most cultures
have said a firm ‘no’ to. It's also behavior for which there's no recognized
science demonstrating a genetic or hormonal origin. And it's also not
beneficial and does not stand the definition of marriage, used for millennia that
is, the act of consummation. It's another sad fact of homosexual behavior that
two men or two women can never consummate a marriage; they can never conceive
children together. This should still have some standing and it remains a fact
that there are only two types of human in the world: male and female. Any other distinctions made are appearance,
custom, and construction. So marriage is the lawful, orderly confirmation of
what we already see in nature.”
Linda, why should the equal protection argument be made in
favor of Christian behavior? Christian behavior is changeable; people are not
born “naturally” Christian. So the definition of “person” which is used in the
Fourteenth Amendment is being twisted to make this assumption. So in other
words what you’re trying to say is that Christian people are people, but gay
people are not in fact people. Oh, okay, got it, thank you Republicans.
“And it's also not beneficial and does not stand the
definition of marriage, used for millennia that is, the act of consummation.
It's another sad fact of homosexual behavior that two men or two women can
never consummate a marriage; they can never conceive children together” Whoa
hold on, two men or two women can’t consummate? Oh honey if only you knew how
two men could consummate a marriage. But then again I doubt you’ve ever had sex
that good.
Here’s a question for
you all. How many conservative Christians have heard the rhetoric of how
same-sex marriages don’t count because nobody can get pregnant during the
marriage? Because essentially you’re alienating those Christian conservatives
who, for whatever reason cannot become pregnant.
“This should still have some standing and it remains a fact
that there are only two types of human in the world: male and female. Any other distinctions made are appearance,
custom, and construction” So gay men and women are not actually male or female?
This does not make any sense at all to me. So there are only male and female people? Apparently you’ve never heard of
intersex people and you probably don’t care to know about them.
So Linda, I’m not sure if you are aware of this but
sexuality, whether it’s gay, lesbian, bisexual, is not an activity. Your sexuality
or lack thereof, is who you are as a person. If I never have sex in my life, I
am still heterosexual.
Linda, all I really have to say is you need to be educated
on human sexuality before you open your mouth. Because when you open your mouth
and spew out trash like that, all you’re doing is showing how ignorant you
right wing Republicans really are.
“So marriage is the lawful, orderly confirmation of what we
already see in nature” So, Linda, I have to ask the question, when did you consciously
choose to be heterosexual? How long have you been struggling with your same sex
attraction? Essentially what you are trying to say Linda is that everybody is
strongly bisexual. That everybody who identifies as being straight consciously chooses
to be straight.
I don’t really know what else to say besides Christian
fundamentalists need to stop. Its radical people like Linda Harvey who are
oppressing the L.G.B.T community and it is so wrong for people to actually
think that someone who is gay is not a person. Linda Harvey and all those other
people like her, pull your head out of your ass now. That's what I'd like to say, but since that isn't very considerate to say, my advice to people like Linda Harvey and Fred Phelps (remember Westboro Baptist Church) is become more informed if you want to spew your hate around. So when you do spew hate, at least its informed hatred. That is all I have to say,
Cheers.
No comments:
Post a Comment